This week many investors myself included have been hit by reality. The reality that everything is not as it may seem. Last week the whole of the investing world was enthralled by one thing. The biggest IPO it was called, an IPO to end all IPOs’, but what an anti-climax. Facebook opened had a slight upward movement then tanked. For speculating reasons only we were holding it in the JML portfolio, which is up significantly this week vix be thanked, I say speculating reasons because there really is no investment in fb right now the company is way overvalued and most people were hoping to jump in and ride the stock during its first day pop which usually occurs with most tech IPOs. The fact that LinkedIn, yelp and groupon all went public without ever making a single positive cent in earnings and cannot even touch the amount of revenue that facebook makes but all went up considerably on their first days of public trading supported this.
There are severel reasons the first day pop most people expected did not occur, it was partly due to the trading glitches that occurred, partly due to the overvaluation of the company, partly due to too many shares, partly due to the current economic environment and the fact that the main underwriter signal duped investors. All this contributed to the first day failure and the continued failure in the stock which so far is down almost 18% from IPO price.
This brings me to the main topic of this article “imaginary value”, what has the world come to when a company that is based solely on a single website is worth more than two of the biggest car manufacturers in north america combined in GM and Ford. How did the underwriters come up with a 100 billion valuation do they seriously think that Facebook will grow revenue and earnings to support such a valuation. As great as Facebook is, it is not and probably will never be, worth 100 billion dollars. Both the investing public and the underwriters believed in the hype of the name, the 900 million + users (all of which could use Facebook without ever clicking on an ad),they imagined and thus assumed that this equated to such a valuation but does it really. I still believe that any website that does not have a significant barrier to entry except that a lot of people use it is destined for failure. Tastes change, people move on from products, five years ago you could still buy a VCR you’d be hard pressed to find one now and with websites the change happens much more quickly. Previously I wrote about LinkedIn and Yelp and Max has harped on about Groupon. All recent tech IPO companies, all with very flaky business models, all significantly overvalued. I am adding Facebook to that group. I love the service that each site provides (except Groupon) but do I believe that they should be valued at 100 billion dollars I say No and I think the market is agreeing with me right now.



Yelp