Here We Go Again…

The JML fund was ripped from its summer slumber this afternoon–After effectively sidelining the fund for most of the summer, we’ve got a play we’re happy to call our own:

The complacency is palpable. Its our opinion that we’ve exceeded merely having a rift between steadily appreciating equity prices and smoothly evaporating volatility on the options side; we’re in the uncanny valley.

We have a simple solution for this: we’ve just bought 100 December contracts to call VXX US @ $12 for $1.70 (Total Cost $17,000 plus 40 bps commission). To compound our terror over the next few months, we’ve gone short 4 December S&P 500 E-Mini Futures at 1405 (We provided $20,000 to meet our initial margin requirements of $4,375 per contract–the position has a notional value of -$280,000).

We’ll go through our reasoning over the next few days as there are some other things on our minds (i.e. CPA rebalancing is requiring some harder decisions  than originally anticipated)…

Trade Tickets:

 

Print Friendly

How d’you like them Apples?

Have a feeling that we’re being a bit greedy by hanging on to our Netflix Puts through tomorrow. Have a feeling that we’re going to see mixed signals from Apple. I feel that we’re going to see them miss the iPhone whisper numbers of 33 million units and come in with something between 28 and 30 million. The iPad also only had 2 weeks of sale time during the last quarter which might also be a detriment. That said, we see the margins on the unrefreshed MacBooks being the highest ever–perhaps enough to be an equalizing factor all on its own–though we have doubts.

Anyway, we’re not too sure of what to make of the negative sentiment we’ve seen on Apple the last few days but by this afternoon we were down to $555ish before abating to the $560s. We think that there is going to be some serious swings regardless and are playing a straddle with May calls at 580 and May puts at 540. The possible run-on effects on tech from a poor showing are why we’re hanging on to Netflix through tomorrow morning. Most interesting and a bit worrying to us while we go into this trade is the implied options volatility of over 10% (~$57 cost on $560 straddle)–this is over 3 times more than the historic 3% move we’ve observed over the last 12 quarters.

 

Print Friendly

Back to reality?

Pretty excited with the after-hours action on Netflix this afternoon. Though top and bottom line came in better than the street expected, the company still managed to run a pre-adjustment loss of $0.08 per share on 21% higher year-on-year revenue. Even more notably, NFLX missed the high side of their guidance on subscriber growth (supposedly the main metric we should be looking at) and provided guidance of even lower growth next quarter with a projected addition of at most 800,000 new subs. Also, DVD subscribers are expected to decrease at an accelerating rate. Doesn’t exactly sound like a titillating buy.

Anyway, the $100 Puts we purchased on March 23rd look like they’re going to worth upwards of $1500 a contract if things stay as they are…

Print Friendly

Overexposed: Rise of the ETN

On Friday, the first ETNs directly listed in Canada began trading. These were issued by Barclays Bank under their ubiquitous iPath banner. We’re going to have S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures hedged in CAD (VIX CN Equity) and S&P 500 Dynamic VIX hedged in CAD (DVX CN Equity) and finally a Pure Beta Crude Oil CAD-Hedged ETN (PBO CN Equity).

On the surface this obviously points to an increasing sophistication of Canadian investors and perhaps the increasing importance of Canada to international firms (just look at how effectively BlackRock swallowed Claymore). But peering a little bit deeper, I grow fearful of the possible effects caused by the ignorance of investors regarding the dangerous nature of these products the moment market conditions become ‘abnormal’. Devastatingly, these products are meant to be used tactically to hedge against such ‘abnormality’.

Reading David Pett’s article in the National Post I was pretty shocked to see the lack of a delineation between the theory and reality of ETNs; he states quite correctly that:

Exchange-traded notes are similar to exchange-traded funds with performance tied to an underlying index.

But unlike ETFs, they are structured as senior debt notes issued typically by a major bank such as Barclays, who are the largest provider of ETNs in the world.

But I freak out when he says very matter-of-factly that:

While ETF returns may differ from the underlying index being tracked, ETNs provide error-free tracking of their underlying indexes minus annual fees.

Error-free‘ is quite a dangerous statement to make (and indeed quite a dangerous assumption for investors to make) when the we have observed that there are rather significant errors to be found in these instruments’ tracking.

Two examples are the disconnect that happened a few weeks ago between the Credit Suisse [[TVIX]] instrument and between Van Eck‘s Market Vectors China [[PEK]] and the Chinese A-share index it should be tracking:

Suffice it to say, I believe the false security investors have in the economic reality that is supposedly underpinning these ETNs (be it Credit Suisse’s credit worthiness or the value of a basket of derivatives which have been amalgamated in order to synthetically replicate the movement of an underlying asset) has the potential to cause a significant amount of pain. In investment management, the lower case Greek letter omega ω represents Tracking Error which is a measure of how closely a portfolio (or instrument) follows the index to which it is benchmarked. I have a feeling we will be hearing a lot more about ‘omega’ in the next decade. I’m going to go so far as predicting that shortly we will be seeing a plethora of Omega-Swaps and Omega-Options to protect investors against potential disconnects between the instruments they are using and the indexes they think they are tracking. I will be conducting further research into this throughout the summer.

A valuation easter egg:

ω

Print Friendly

Food for thought

Our puts on Chipotle are off to a slow start though sentiment seems to be joining our side:

Chipotle Is An Overheated Burrito

An interesting tidbit which gives me pause as I consider taking ever greater positions in volatility instruments: “The market can stay irrational far longer than you can stay solvent.”  Ugh, I know the feeling — have gone through two waves of expiring VXX options with disappointment.

Print Friendly